If an examinee has a general weighted average of 90% but has a score of less than 50% in one of his/her subjects, did he/she pass?

In academic assessment and professional licensure contexts, there are typically established criteria for passing or failing, which may include both overall performance and minimum score thresholds in individual subjects. In this scenario, even though the examinee has an impressive general weighted average of 90%, the crucial factor is the low score in one specific subject, which is below the required minimum passing score of 50%.

In most educational systems, especially in fields requiring licensure like engineering, scoring below a certain threshold in any subject can lead to an automatic failure, irrespective of overall averages. This policy ensures that examinees demonstrate proficiency and understanding in all necessary areas of the curriculum. Hence, having a general average of 90% does not mitigate the impact of failing to achieve at least a minimum score in one subject.

Therefore, the determination that the examinee did not pass is grounded in the requirement that minimum competency must be demonstrated in each subject area, rather than relying solely on overall performance. This principle is typically enforced by governing boards or educational authorities, ensuring that all aspects of the curriculum are mastered by the candidates seeking licensure.