According to the Code of Professional Ethics, how should an aeronautical engineer handle criticism of another's work?

An aeronautical engineer should exercise due restraint in public when addressing criticism of another's work, as guided by the Code of Professional Ethics. This approach is important because it promotes professionalism and respect within the engineering community. By maintaining a level of restraint, the engineer ensures that any critique is constructive rather than damaging, fostering a collaborative environment focused on improvement rather than personal attacks. Publicly criticizing a colleague could undermine professional relationships and diminish trust, which is essential in a field that relies heavily on teamwork and shared knowledge.

Additionally, suggesting that only positive feedback be provided—or criticizing freely in public—does not align with the principles of professional growth and accountability. While private discussions can be beneficial, the emphasis on public restraint acknowledges the need for transparency and integrity, advocating for constructive dialogue that respects the contributions of others despite any criticisms that may arise. Exercising due restraint allows the engineer to uphold their professional integrity while contributing to a supportive and respectful professional atmosphere.